Guaranteed
Social Security Benefits: Make It So
The
comically complicated PSA (Personal Savings Account) legislation bouncing
around Congress will raise taxes, increase investment risk, and expand the size
of government. Let's stop applying Band-Aids to spouting arteries. We are
looking for a guaranteed retirement benefit program, and organizations capable
of providing one. Additionally, we want the new program to reduce taxes, create
jobs, boost the economy, cut prices, and increase salaries. Difficult? Not
really.
This is
the conceptual outline of a five-year implantation plan, a starting point for
the brainstorming needed to develop the nitty-gritty details, rules,
regulations, laws, and agencies. All that is needed is the will to change
things productively. Politicians like to debate changes to determine why new
ideas can't be implemented. Here's a plan that must be implemented. Have a
listen, throw out an incumbent, and protect your future.
Guaranteed
benefit programs have been around for over 100 years, and millions of people
throughout the world enjoy the benefits they provide. Here's how they do it.
Every month, they deposit money into a trustee-managed investment account. The
money avoids the stock market (for the most part), index funds, commodities, or
MLM-like derivatives and is carefully invested in high quality debt securities,
many privately placed for better yields.
All
earnings are reinvested in similar securities, and the fund eventually produces
more in earnings than the participating investors contribute; the trustee
manages the portfolio. At retirement, the deposits stop and the guaranteed
benefits begin. The benefit is guaranteed for life--- extraordinary concept,
older and wiser than any living congressman or presidential candidate.
What
if, instead of donating 7.6% of your salary (15.3% if you are self employed) to
support the war de jour: (a) you could choose to deposit from 3% to 5% of your
salary in a guaranteed retirement program maturing anytime after age 60, (b)
the lifetime benefit is totally income tax free, and (c) your employer uses his
savings to either create jobs, raise non-executive salaries, reduce prices, or
increase shareholder dividends. Interested?
The
SSRIA (Social Security Retirement Income Annuity) is a new and improved version
of the ancient Deferred Fixed Annuity--- a boring but guaranteed
fixed-amount-only retirement vehicle. (Wrong, I don't sell annuities--- they
just happen to be the perfect Social Security problem solver.) There are a
bunch of new wrinkles: (1) The minimum contribution is mandated for all
employed persons, but anyone with a Social Security number can have a SSRIA.
(2)
Qualified (15 years of Fixed Annuity experience) SSRIA providors are assigned
to participants randomly by SS#--- only one per participant, per lifetime,
please. Since the "qualified-by-qualified-people" providor companies
have no acquisition, retention, or advertising expenses, there are no sales
commissions; administrative expenses and investment management fees are capped
at .5% of the total fund Working Capital.
(3) All
SSRIA contracts, regardless of provider, will contain the same terms, interest
guarantees, retirement benefit choices, and pre-retirement death benefits, thus
eliminating any incentives for internal fraud and manipulation of statistics.
(4)
Qualified providers will establish separate tax exempt, "mutual"
subsidiaries to manage and control operations, assuring that profits are
distributed to contract holders. Profits are allocated 50% to active contract
holders and 50% to a health insurance trust fund for retired participants
(HITF). (5) All providers will use the same mortality, investment earnings, and
expense assumptions in their annuity benefit calculations, and only Life and
Life + One Annuities are available. (6) Benefit payments will be jointly
guaranteed by the parent companies and the Federal Pension Benefit Guarantee
Corporation. Parent Company income taxes would be reduced by 50%.
Implementation
would be completed over a five-year period, and interpreted with an
"intent of the law" bias:
In Year
One, the Federal Government would purchase single premium SSRIAs for all active
Social Security recipients--- hey, they squandered the money. Also in year one:
(1) all employee and employer contributions would be cut by 25% (the first of
four such annual cuts) and deposited to individual SSRIAs. (2) All Federal,
State and Local income taxes on SSRIA payments would be declared illegal and
forever prohibited. (3) A private company would be chartered to audit the
disposition of corporate tax savings within all public companies and private
companies employing 10 or more persons 18 months before enactment.
In
Years Two through whenever, the Federal Government would add to retiring persons
SSRIAs to bring the annuity benefit to the level guaranteed by the OASI plus
COLAs. Once an equalization level is achieved, federal responsibility would
cease for that retiree.
In
Years Three through Five, all Federal, State and Local Income taxes on all
forms of private retirement accounts (IRA, 401(k), 403(b), etc.) would be
reduced by one third per year, and would be declared forever illegal at the end
of year Five. A Federal Sales Tax of 1% or 2% (on all final-product-sales, not
a VAT) could be enacted after the second year's cut. From Year Three forward,
SSRIA holders would be able to view their projected monthly benefit at various
retirement ages, based on contract provisions and their deposit and earnings
history.
By the
end of the Year Five: (1) Employers would have no Social Security tax
responsibilities, but would be responsible for either employing more people,
reducing their product prices, raising non-executive salaries not subject to
the minimum wage, or paying higher dividends to shareholders. Any manipulations
of their operations or executive compensation packages clearly intended to
circumvent the intent of these reforms would be fined appropriately within the
Board of Directors, senior officers, and legal council of the Company---
personally, and in each capacity.
That's
right, if a senior officer is also on the Board, and responsible for
controlling jobs, product prices, or dividends, he or she would be personally
responsible for three separate fines. (2) Employees would select their level of
salary deduction for year six; the election can be changed once in any
twelve-month period. No employee can contribute more than the maximum 5% of
salary to an SSRIA.
Of
course there are a lot of ifs, ands, and buts in here, but it is a clearly
doable program within an established professional infrastructure. It will
increase jobs, reduce taxes, boost the economy and reduce the role of
government--- in 50,000 less words and 25 fewer years than any approach even
being considered in Congress.
Make it
so--- yeah, you!
Steve
Selengut
http://www.sancoservices.com
http://www.kiawahgolfinvestmentseminars.com
Professional
Portfolio Management since 1979
Author
of: "The Brainwashing of the American Investor: The Book that Wall Street
Does Not Want YOU to Read", and "A Millionaire's Secret Investment
Strategy"
Social
Security,tax reform,retirement
plan,benefits,savings,politics,taxation,government,PSA,trust fund,COLA,
legislation, Band Aid,guarantee,jobs,economy
Guaranteed
Social Security Benefits: Make It So
This is
a conceptual outline, a starting point for the brainstorming needed to develop
the nitty-gritty details, rules, regulations, laws, and agencies. All that is
needed is the will to change. Politicians like to debate changes to determine
why new ideas can't be implemented. Here's a plan that must be implemented.
Have a listen, throw out an incumbent.
What
if, instead of donating 7.6% of your salary (15.3% if you are self employed) to
support the war de jour: (a) you could choose to deposit from 3% to 5% of your
salary in a guaranteed retirement program maturing anytime after age 60, (b)
the lifetime benefit is totally income tax free, and (c) your employer uses his
savings to either create jobs, raise non-executive salaries, reduce prices, or
increase shareholder dividends.